SmallNetBuilder Forums

Go Back   SmallNetBuilder Forums > NAS > NAS Article Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-08-2008, 08:03 PM
tornado69 tornado69 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
Default Thecus N7700 Unleashed

In case any one missed the press release from Thecus today:

http://www.thecus.com/news_contentx.php?nid=708

I look forward to the review of this beastie
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-08-2008, 10:48 PM
iwod iwod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 52
Default

NICE! Interesting i think this is not based on Linux at all. ( FreeBSD ?? ) Since it has support for ZFS.

Having seen how filesystem and software is the main bottleneck for transfer speed. I can wait to see how ZFS will fare. Since it has much better throughput, security and error correction.

I hope Smallnetbuilder will test this out soon.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2008, 10:45 PM
iwod iwod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 52
Default

After looking at the pricing. It gets a real funny reason.

Why would i spend 1099 on an NAS that has 5 times worst Performance / Value Ratio to a Self Build Computer?

The Size is no longer tiny for NAS. It has a 300W power supply.

Doesn't the more HDD space and more expensive for the NAS gets the less value the NAS holds?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-14-2008, 05:47 AM
Bart Bart is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bruges, Belgium
Posts: 84
Default

My exact thougt. If NAS's start using some serious power (and start costing some serious dough - out of the league of most regular users anyway), what advantage is left over simply configuring a pc with a bunch of disks in it running Clarkconnect or similar? Not the speed. The footprint maybe? Bwoh... Easy of configuring? Not really.

In other words, devices like these at these prices might end up killing their own market.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-14-2008, 12:40 PM
iwod iwod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 52
Default

Exactly. I can understand that adding more port doesn't add more cost. ( I think it is relatively small ) but they could charge a lot more at the current scale.

However i think they should go for the other way, where the more HDD slot inside NAS, the cheaper price / HDD slot it should be. This way customer will want to buy bigger one. Instead of the current INSANE price for NAS.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-14-2008, 01:46 PM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is offline
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,977
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iwod View Post
However i think they should go for the other way, where the more HDD slot inside NAS, the cheaper price / HDD slot it should be. This way customer will want to buy bigger one. Instead of the current INSANE price for NAS.
That approach makes no economic sense since it costs more to add more SATA support.
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
None


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006-2009 Pudai LLC All Rights Reserved.
Comscore