SmallNetBuilder Forums

Go Back   SmallNetBuilder Forums > LAN & WAN > LAN & WAN Article Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-16-2009, 10:54 AM
vnangia vnangia is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Posts: 75
Default More MoCA: D-Link DXN-221 & Actiontec ECB2200 Reviewed

I've been watching MoCA as a possible backup if we can't get good quality network cable when we redo our house in Asia, but I'm curious about interoperability: is it possible to use one of the D-Links and one of the Netgears? Or is it basically only sold in matched pairs with no provision for needing to buy a replacement?
__________________

---
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." -Richard Cook
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-16-2009, 02:53 PM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is online now
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,980
Default

MoCA is MoCA. You can mix and match adapters without a problem.
They are sold in pairs as convenience, since you will in most cases need two (unless you have a MoCA-enabled router).
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-16-2009, 09:18 PM
Johnny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moca w/ Satellite?

Ok, the article said ...

" the Actiontec adapter has no admin access and therefore nothing to tweak. This also means that you can't set it into "All Pass" mode if you want to jump through the hoops required to get MoCA to work on a coax system that has satellite TV on it."


So ... IS there a way to get a Dlink or Netgear MoCA working on a satellite system (DirecTv)? WiFi in my house is horrible .. Wireless N products don't work at all ... I have 4 D-Link Wireless N bridges and performance on 5ghz is about 2mb/s about 20 feet in one direction and about 56k (yes, I mean K!!!) at 20 ft the other way. Not much different in 2.4ghz either. There are a couple locations that I can not wire cat5 so looking for an option but I have Directv .. can anyone verify this is possible? I know the vendor does not support it, but I'd really like to know if it would work and what performance I can get if anyone knows this ...
Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2009, 11:15 AM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is online now
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,980
Default

From the D-Link DXN-220 manual:

Quote:
DBS Satellite Television with Terrestrial Television (Off-Air)
The Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) uses proprietary satellite channel-stacking switch or Low-Noise Block (LNB) to
distribute the resulting signal (usually 950 to 2150 MHz) in the same cable network that carries the lower-frequency
terrestrial television from an outdoor antenna. Another Diplexer then separates the signals to the receiver of the TV set
and the DBS set-top box (STB).
Most of the satellite switches are not designed to pass DXN-220 network signal and prevents it from forming a network.
It is recommended that satellite signal and DXN-220 network signal should remain on separate cable networks. If
separate wiring cannot be done, then additional components have to be installed:
1. Install Triplexer to separate UHF/VHF, DXN-220, and DBS signals.
2. Install MoCA Coupler switch before the satellite switch.
The exercise is left to the reader...
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2009, 01:00 AM
eaadams eaadams is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 32
Default

Now that you have a couple MoCA's could you test them with multiple computers hooked up to multiple MoCA end points?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2009, 11:59 AM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is online now
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eaadams View Post
Now that you have a couple MoCA's could you test them with multiple computers hooked up to multiple MoCA end points?
I ran tests with multiple connections, but forgot to include that data in the review. The Actiontec and D-Link performed the same as the NETGEAR, i.e. throughput peaks just shy of 140 Mbps with around 4 simultaneous connections.

I'll correct the review.
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2009, 01:12 PM
DavidH DavidH is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Default

D-Link Support today told me on the phone that the DXN-220 component of the DXN-221 kit has only _one_ coax port. That agrees with what I saw 1.5 months ago, when the Dlink.com site was still showing a picture of the back side of the DXN-220.

However your review, Tim, includes a picture of the back side of a DXN-220 that has _two_ coax ports. That agrees with D-Link's January announcement of the DXN-221 kit, which included a similar picture showing two coax ports.

Tim, it is possible that (as I suggested in a post on the Netgear MCAB1001 thread) D-Link originally designed the DXN-220 with two coax ports, but changed it to one port before they shipped in April. Are you sure the kit you reviewed was what actually is shipping? Or did you use your flux capacitor to obtain a copy of their _next_ revision to the DXN-220?

I took the liberty of mentioning your review to the D-Link sales support person I spoke to, and he suggested that you contact Alfred Loya, aloya@dlink.com. Another contact address would be productinfo@dlink.com.

David H.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-19-2009, 01:22 PM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is online now
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,980
Default

The DXN-220's I reviewed are marked hardware revision A1.

I'm checking with D-Link and will post back.
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-19-2009, 02:26 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How concerned should I be about encryption? The Actiontec has no interface to put a password but the d-Link and Netgear do. Is this a feature that everyone should look for, or only those in certain situations, like apartment buildings?
Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-19-2009, 02:34 PM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is online now
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
How concerned should I be about encryption?
Depends on your situation and is similar to powerline networking.

At any rate, I wouldn't buy the Actiontec due to it high cost and lower maximum throughput.
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
None


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006-2009 Pudai LLC All Rights Reserved.
Comscore