SmallNetBuilder Forums
Go Back   SmallNetBuilder Forums > Security > Security Article Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-29-2009, 06:39 PM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is offline
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,100
Thanks: 158
Thanked 617 Times in 523 Posts
thiggins is just starting out
Default

I heard from Ivan at QNAP. The issue has been material planning more than anything else.

The wait is over, however. TS-639 Pro, TS-509 Pro (for retest) and TS-119 are on the way in.
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-29-2009, 08:18 PM
beq beq is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 50
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
beq is just starting out
Default

That's great news. Unless I'm mistaken the new TS-119 should actually be shipping with their new v3.0 firmware, so I also look forward to your impressions on it.

I also hope that their material planning can produce a TS-809 for testing soon!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-30-2009, 08:53 AM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is offline
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,100
Thanks: 158
Thanked 617 Times in 523 Posts
thiggins is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beq View Post
I also hope that their material planning can produce a TS-809 for testing soon!
Why? I frankly don't understand the drive toward these > 4 bay NASes.
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-30-2009, 09:37 AM
QuickThinking QuickThinking is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
QuickThinking is just starting out
Default Linux file servers are easy?!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by wpns View Post
Load it at your house, do differentials to his house, everything else is a SMOP. 8*)
For everyone else that was like "what the heck is a SMOP"..

A linux file server sounds fine, but what I was hoping for (locally at least) was that I would be able to do some sort of restore to a point in time. I've read A LOT of material this weekend about a program called BackupPC. It would run on a Linux server of my choice, and essentially pull backups from my Windows XX boxes using either a Samba share (probably the default c$) or using an rsync client (was looking at DeltaCopy).

Some concerns I've run into:
Apparently the hard links that a program like BackupPC uses in order to link all the delta (change) files back to the initial file creates problems for some file systems. NTFS, FAT32, and FAT16 are out of the question and so ext3, reiserf, ZFS and a bunch of other unix / linux file systems I've never had much experience with are recommended. Then to complicate that, rsync apparently has some problems with hard links in certain situations, and so it may be more difficult than just trying to schedule an rsync job to mirror my file server or Nas's data store against a remote device. Maybe I'm wrong there, or maybe utilities like rsnapshot address these concerns, or more likely, I just don't know what I'm talking about. However, articles like How to Copy a Filesystem and Preserve Hard Links in Linux by Jeremy Zawodny make me very nervous.

I could probably get a poor man’s version of restore in time by scheduling each days backup to go do a different folder (Monday, Tuesday, etc.) but I'm pretty sure that would put rsync or other file synchronization protocols into overtime and max out my ISP bandwidth usage trying to keep the offsite mirror in check.

I'm hoping someone, interested in point-in-time restoration, with a small windows network, AND interested in offsite backups has solved the problem and documented it somewhere, but if not the next best thing is to hash out a custom setup with the guys on these forums (which I agree are excellent) and then document it for everyone else.

PS> The MSI Wind PC, very interesting looking, thanks.

Last edited by QuickThinking; 03-30-2009 at 09:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-30-2009, 03:41 PM
beq beq is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 50
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
beq is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thiggins View Post
Why? I frankly don't understand the drive toward these > 4 bay NASes.
I'm actually interested to see reviews benchmarking the faster speed of the QNAP TS-809 Pro (Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz) and the rackmount TS-809U-RP (Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz) -- compared to the 1.6GHz Celeron or Atom CPUs used by the other QNAP Intel models.

Frankly I don't expect the Celeron/Atom QNAP units to be able to outperform the Netgear ReadyNAS Pro, so I would've thought that it would be in QNAP's best interest to submit their fastest (809/809U) NASes for review...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-30-2009, 04:02 PM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is offline
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,100
Thanks: 158
Thanked 617 Times in 523 Posts
thiggins is just starting out
Default

Well, remember that support for > 64KB network transfers is needed for > ~70 MB/s.
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/conte.../30679/75/1/2/
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 AM.


Top 10 Stats
Top Posters* Top Thanked
RMerlin  349
stevech  130
john9527  123
azazel1024  121
L&LD  106
hggomes  82
noric  79
ChristineBCW  67
AndreyPopov  63
Trip  56
RMerlin  5834
stevech  338
john9527  284
ryzhov_al  272
TeHashX  229
L&LD  213
RogerSC  195
sinshiva  146
joegreat  126
sfx2000  124
Most Viewed Threads* Hottest Threads*
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  17791
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  13266
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  9802
Old My...  5999
Old Most stable...  5269
Old RT-AC87R (U)...  4477
Old T-Mobile...  3868
Old RT-N66U...  3397
Old Can't trust...  3046
Old Does...  2901
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  122
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  87
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  61
Old My...  57
Old RT-AC87R (U)...  39
Old USB N...  37
Old T-Mobile...  34
Old Most stable...  30
Old Range: G vs...  28
Old New...  28


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006-2014 Pudai LLC All Rights Reserved.