SmallNetBuilder Forums
Go Back   SmallNetBuilder Forums > LAN & WAN > Routers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2012, 05:34 PM
RamGuy RamGuy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 89
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
RamGuy is just starting out
Default Shouldn't DMZ get around double NAT issues?

I'm faced with a slight troublesome network configuration whereas I have to go through a double NAT solution.

The deal is that I'm living with a shared Internet connection, but need to run my own separate subnet with my own IP-configurations and solutions. So basically I will have my pfSense server running from behind another router hosted by the house owner as we don't want to be on the same local network.


This of course bring the trouble regarding double NATing and all the port forwarding nonsense that provides. UPNP and automatic port mapping wont work when double NATing and I thought the whole idea behind DMZ on a router was to get around issues like this.


But after putting my pfSense server's WAN IP in our house owners router DMZ I'm still not seeing UPNP and automatic port forwarding, nor manually port forwarding working from my network like before we had double NAT?

If DMZ is out of the question, how would one resolve the issues regarding double NATing and getting ports successfully following through the network? And what is exactly the point with a DMZ function in a router if not for issues like this?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2012, 11:35 PM
jdabbs's Avatar
jdabbs jdabbs is offline
Very Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: al.us
Posts: 627
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
jdabbs is just starting out
Default

The separate network is understandable, but is the different subnet a must-have requirement? If not, consider setting up your pfsense box as a transparent firewall. Only permit local gateway and Internet traffic in and out, and run DHCP on your side with a non-overlapping scope.
__________________
"No battle plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshal von Moltke
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2012, 05:39 AM
devnull devnull is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
devnull is just starting out
Default

Try one-to-one (1:1) NAT. Since you can have as many IPs on the WAN side of your pfsense box as you want, you should be able to use 1:1 NAT to place each device separately onto the home network.

Many-to-one NAT (i.e. the way 99% of all NATs operate) is only needed when you only have one IP address to talk to the rest of the world. Since you're inside a LAN you can take as many as you want (probably limited by pfsense software, but more than enough).

You'll need one IP address on the home LAN (your WAN port) for each of your devices on your LAN port.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.


Top 10 Stats
Top Posters* Top Thanked
RMerlin  400
john9527  160
azazel1024  116
htismaqe  103
sfx2000  87
stevech  74
ColinTaylor  69
AndreyPopov  58
TonyH  54
bbb0777  42
RMerlin  6060
john9527  391
stevech  351
ryzhov_al  280
TeHashX  237
L&LD  232
RogerSC  201
sinshiva  147
sfx2000  134
joegreat  126
Most Viewed Threads* Hottest Threads*
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  29857
Old RT-AC68P...  2735
Old Brainstorming...  2693
Old Advice on...  2602
Old Looking for...  2364
Old RT-AC68U...  1907
Old Asus...  1823
Old Issues...  1784
Old Stable...  1689
Old AC-68...  1623
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  212
Old Brainstorming...  49
Old Advice on...  49
Old Looking for...  35
Old RT-AC68P...  33
Old WiFi...  27
Old Stable...  25
Old Issues...  25
Old WiFi Rates  23
Old RT-AC68U...  22


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006-2014 Pudai LLC All Rights Reserved.