SmallNetBuilder Forums
Go Back   SmallNetBuilder Forums > LAN & WAN > Routers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2012, 04:16 PM
dracoss dracoss is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dracoss is just starting out
Default Need Some suggestions

I am updating a hotspot at a campground.
I have four static ip's available.

There are three access points that maintain connections.

I was thinking about wan balancing.
Using an RV042, setting this to do the front end work for the wan.

Then using a server with either untangle or pfsense maybe even smoothwall
to limit bandwidth, and a small amount of content filtering.

The primary access point can have from 75 users to over a 100 during peak times.

One access point services an overnight area, where we have only about 20 to 30 users any given day.

The last access point services a difficult area with many Tree's Pines.
That is were I ues a one watt. Bout 50 users thers any given time.

This is a rural area, broadband is supplied by frontier. Only real game in town.
And the most that is offered is 3 meg connections.

So with all this in mind as well the budget is very limited as well, so as always someone wants the world by does not have the means to support it.

Here are my thoughts.

Will the RV042 stand up to demand, if its only function is to do wan balancing?
Or is it effective enough to not only handle the wan but limit per user bandwith caps?
When I say caps I mean that each user have a maximum bandwidth availible at lets say 512 kbs, and limit concurrent sessions to maybe 40.

Another question:
Of the distro's available Untangle, Pfsense,Clearos, smoothwall which is going to install and configure the easiest with out hardware issues at install.
I have been trying all of them on different hardware. Untangle always seems to install on what ever I through at it. But I think bandwith management is not free.
Knowing that with so many users the least amount of work I require of each network piece, the less likely to have issues.
Like my access points, I uses them basically as a radio for connection and let the servers do all the dhcp and such.

Captive portal, Do you think that this is a better way to enforce bandwidth policies?

I know this is long, but I thought I would put this out there and get some advice.

Thanks for your time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Top 10 Stats
Top Posters* Top Thanked
RMerlin  428
azazel1024  130
L&LD  98
john9527  96
htismaqe  83
ColinTaylor  76
stevech  73
hggomes  57
sfx2000  55
Anzaia  49
RMerlin  6278
john9527  451
stevech  353
ryzhov_al  289
TeHashX  252
L&LD  242
RogerSC  202
sinshiva  146
sfx2000  136
joegreat  127
Most Viewed Threads* Hottest Threads*
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  51238
Old RT-AC68 -...  23287
Old Moderate Nat...  5112
Old ASUS RT-N66U...  4567
Old iOS 8.1...  4066
Old RT-AC87U -...  2560
Old WiFi...  2484
Old RT-AC68P QOS...  2080
Old AC68U,...  1877
Old Ruckus...  1758
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  233
Old RT-AC68 -...  137
Old Review: 24...  35
Old iOS 8.1...  33
Old Moderate Nat...  32
Old WiFi...  27
Old RT-AC87U -...  26
Old How to flash...  24
Old RT-AC68P QOS...  24
Old Linksys...  21


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006-2014 Pudai LLC All Rights Reserved.