SmallNetBuilder Forums
Go Back   SmallNetBuilder Forums > LAN & WAN > Routers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2012, 03:16 PM
dracoss dracoss is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dracoss is just starting out
Default Need Some suggestions

I am updating a hotspot at a campground.
I have four static ip's available.

There are three access points that maintain connections.

I was thinking about wan balancing.
Using an RV042, setting this to do the front end work for the wan.

Then using a server with either untangle or pfsense maybe even smoothwall
to limit bandwidth, and a small amount of content filtering.

The primary access point can have from 75 users to over a 100 during peak times.

One access point services an overnight area, where we have only about 20 to 30 users any given day.

The last access point services a difficult area with many Tree's Pines.
That is were I ues a one watt. Bout 50 users thers any given time.

This is a rural area, broadband is supplied by frontier. Only real game in town.
And the most that is offered is 3 meg connections.

So with all this in mind as well the budget is very limited as well, so as always someone wants the world by does not have the means to support it.

Here are my thoughts.

Will the RV042 stand up to demand, if its only function is to do wan balancing?
Or is it effective enough to not only handle the wan but limit per user bandwith caps?
When I say caps I mean that each user have a maximum bandwidth availible at lets say 512 kbs, and limit concurrent sessions to maybe 40.

Another question:
Of the distro's available Untangle, Pfsense,Clearos, smoothwall which is going to install and configure the easiest with out hardware issues at install.
I have been trying all of them on different hardware. Untangle always seems to install on what ever I through at it. But I think bandwith management is not free.
Knowing that with so many users the least amount of work I require of each network piece, the less likely to have issues.
Like my access points, I uses them basically as a radio for connection and let the servers do all the dhcp and such.

Captive portal, Do you think that this is a better way to enforce bandwidth policies?

I know this is long, but I thought I would put this out there and get some advice.

Thanks for your time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 AM.


Top 10 Stats
Top Posters* Top Thanked
RMerlin  362
john9527  153
azazel1024  115
stevech  103
htismaqe  99
sfx2000  81
L&LD  75
TonyH  61
AndreyPopov  53
ColinTaylor  53
RMerlin  6032
john9527  378
stevech  350
ryzhov_al  279
TeHashX  233
L&LD  232
RogerSC  199
sinshiva  147
sfx2000  133
joegreat  126
Most Viewed Threads* Hottest Threads*
Old Shellshock...  27695
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  15757
Old Brainstorming...  2341
Old RT-AC68P  2214
Old Looking for...  2126
Old Advice on...  2108
Old RT-AC68U...  1535
Old Asus...  1508
Old Issues...  1434
Old AC-68...  1354
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  122
Old Advice on...  49
Old Brainstorming...  47
Old Looking for...  35
Old Shellshock...  31
Old Stable...  25
Old Issues...  25
Old WiFi Rates  23
Old RT-AC68U...  22
Old Belkin Pre-N...  21


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006-2014 Pudai LLC All Rights Reserved.