SmallNetBuilder Forums
Go Back   SmallNetBuilder Forums > NAS > NAS Article Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-11-2010, 11:19 AM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is offline
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,247
Thanks: 166
Thanked 638 Times in 542 Posts
thiggins is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall View Post
We are looking for a new NAS at the moment to upgrade from our old Maxtor Shared Storage. Do you recommend purchasing a 4 bay NAS so the storage can be upgraded by installing another drive when needed, since a 1TB dive is only about $55 compared to buying another single or double bay NAS.
On the other hand, if you won't need the additional storage for awhile, you could always buy an older-generation NAS later for less money. Plus you'll have the added benefit of a physically separate unit with newer power supply and fan.

If you're not going to run RAID be sure you get a NAS that supports drive per volume configuration (sometimes called "basic" mode). Synology and QNAP NASes support this mode.
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-25-2010, 01:46 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Diskful or B.Y.O.D.

You wrote:

"Diskful NASes are generally cheaper than BYOD."

Actually, in some countries (France...), NASes and external HDDs are taxed a lot more (20 euros/1 TB) than internal HDDs. Which makes diskful NASes a lot more expensive than BYOD.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-31-2011, 06:49 AM
me3 me3 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
me3 is just starting out
Default

The missing feature I see (in the units I know of), NAS and Windows Home Server - is good backup of the data on the NAS itself.

I work in enterprise IT and am familiar with a wide range of solutions.

I don't run RAID, but like to backup to another internal disk nightly. I then do an offsite copy every 3-6 mths to a USB drive and leave it at a mates house.
The offsite can be a replica, as it's only to protect against catastrophic failure.
The onsite however should have a history associated, this way, data accidentally damaged or deleted can be recovered after some time.

The features I value for my home are:
a) Simple nightly backup to a second internal disk

b) A rotation that keeps a history of changes over time - NTFS hard links can help here for single instance storage. This gives me the last 3 months or so without chewing heaps of space.

c) Auto reclamation of space - set a limit, oldest backups deleted first.

My new QNAP doesn't do this.
Windows Home server (latest version) isn't much better. V1 did all except (c).

I would be interested if any other product had good "backup" functions for the data on the NAS, not simply "replication".

Thanks
Paul
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-02-2011, 03:46 PM
TD99
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Seeking clarification regarding using RAID

Tim, you wrote:

"My strong advice [is] to not use RAID if your storage needs are below 3 TB; stay with single-drive products."

Why do you say this? I ask because I'm in the market for a NAS and my storage needs are probably 1.5 to 2TB max.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-02-2011, 05:50 PM
thiggins's Avatar
thiggins thiggins is offline
Mr. Easy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,247
Thanks: 166
Thanked 638 Times in 542 Posts
thiggins is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TD99 View Post
Tim, you wrote:

"My strong advice [is] to not use RAID if your storage needs are below 3 TB; stay with single-drive products."

Why do you say this? I ask because I'm in the market for a NAS and my storage needs are probably 1.5 to 2TB max.
More drives = more power, noise, heat and people do lose RAID arrays.

KISS is always best.
__________________
Tim Higgins
Managing Editor,SmallNetBuilder.com
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-06-2011, 03:33 PM
TD99
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thiggins View Post
More drives = more power, noise, heat and people do lose RAID arrays.

KISS is always best.
OK, but I am leaning towards a dual-drive RAID1 solution for redundancy's sake. But again, I have maybe 1TB at most to store. Was hoping to store my Acronis backups to the NAS thereby safely storing all my previous digital photos.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Top 10 Stats
Top Posters* Top Thanked
RMerlin  409
azazel1024  135
L&LD  102
john9527  101
htismaqe  89
stevech  75
ColinTaylor  72
hggomes  60
sfx2000  55
Anzaia  49
RMerlin  6280
john9527  457
stevech  353
ryzhov_al  289
TeHashX  253
L&LD  242
RogerSC  203
sinshiva  146
sfx2000  136
joegreat  127
Most Viewed Threads* Hottest Threads*
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  53556
Old RT-AC68 -...  23882
Old Moderate Nat...  5214
Old ASUS RT-N66U...  4717
Old iOS 8.1...  4135
Old RT-AC87U -...  2617
Old WiFi...  2536
Old RT-AC68P QOS...  2154
Old AC68U,...  1958
Old New AC68...  1935
Old Asuswrt-Merli...  238
Old RT-AC68 -...  140
Old Review: 24...  35
Old iOS 8.1...  33
Old Moderate Nat...  32
Old WiFi...  27
Old RT-AC87U -...  26
Old How to flash...  24
Old RT-AC68P QOS...  24
Old Linksys...  21


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006-2014 Pudai LLC All Rights Reserved.